Restoration decisions should be open to review.
Orenna connects project evidence, assumptions, calculations, and decisions so reviewers can follow the work.
Use that record to challenge findings, resolve gaps, and document professional review.
Our Integrity Principles
These principles guide how the platform presents evidence and supports review.
-
Keep documents, source snapshots, and citations alongside the findings they support.
-
Show assumptions, coverage gaps, and model limits alongside results.
-
Record what your team decided, why, and which alternatives it considered. That reasoning remains available for later review.
-
Finalized reports and checklists carry signed manifests: records that identify finalized content and help detect later changes.
-
Practitioners review evidence, validate technical work, and decide what to issue. AI drafts and program-screening results support those decisions.
How the platform supports review
The project record connects source material, analysis, and issued deliverables.
-
Keep supporting material in the Data Room. Source permissions determine what can be retrieved and exported.
-
Outcomes and scenarios retain inputs and assumptions. Program screening exposes rules and overrides. Literature-based public-good values remain separate from funding cashflows.
-
Review report sections and citations before finalizing. Finalization locks that version; create a new report for later changes.
Three checks before sharing
-
Open cited evidence and check whether its geography, date, and method fit the project.
-
Review inputs, missing data, uncertainty, and the scope of any model or funding estimate.
-
Record your decisions and remaining gaps. Keep finalized content and its manifest together.
Source records and signed manifests help reviewers trace the work. Your team and the relevant reviewers remain responsible for technical validation and approval.